Source:Talking Points Memo- Shepard Smith & Chris Wallace. |
Source:Talking Points Memo
There use to be a day in American journalism when reporters were reporters and commentators were commentators. Reporters would write facts that they found and share them with who they worked for and their audience. Commentators and columnists would write about what they thought of the news that was reported and what that meant. In today’s media it’s a little harder to tell the difference between news and commentary. Even though the Washington Post, New York Times and Wall Street Journal still do a very job of reporting.
Even though these three news giants clearly slant in one direction or another, when it comes to their editorials, but you can tell the differences between their reporters and their editorialists. With today’s online partisan media, with “news organizations” clearly slant in one direction or the other. Talking Points Memo on the left and The Daily Caller on the right, who don’t hide from their partisan leanings, but they do it to the point that most of their stories, benefit their side of the aisle ideologically.
And rarely do partisan publications report something that’s negative towards their side of the aisle. Which is why I believe if you are going to follow one of these partisan news organizations”, I suggest you follow them on both sides. Because many times, you’ll only get one side of the story from one of these groups. But follow both of them and you may get the full story, or at least half of it. Some of these “news organizations” are so partisan to the point that they’ll send their columnists and analysts to press conferences, as if they are reporters and not commentators, to ask questions that are intended to benefit or hurt the person that’s giving the press conference.
David Corn does this for the so-called progressive Mother Jones Magazine and Neal Munro does this for the right-wing The Daily Caller. But Neil Munro took it to a different level today at President Obama’s press conference on immigration reform. Where he literally heckled the President, interrupting him as he was giving his speech. Its one thing to not like a President, as Mr. Munro clearly doesn’t, or be against him or even feel that the President is not worthy of the office and feel disrespect for him. But it’s another to disrespect the office, which is what Neil Munro was doing today.
I have no problem with aggressive journalism as its called today, as long as its intended to report facts. And not designed to make the case for one side of an argument or another. But it’s another thing, just to be rude and classless and not just disrespect the person that’s holding the office, but disrespect the office itself. Which is what Neil Munro did today and proved that the right-wing is more than just against President Obama on philosophically.
You can also see this post on WordPress.
You can also see this post at Real Life Journal, on WordPress.
You can also see this post at Real Life Journal, on Blogger.
You can also see this post on WordPress:https://freestatenowplus.wordpress.com/2012/06/15/talking-points-memo-video-fncs-the-fox-report-chris-wallace-calls-presidential-interruption-by-neil-munro-outrageous/
ReplyDeleteYou can also see this post at Real Life Journal:https://reallifejournalplus.wordpress.com/2012/06/15/talking-points-memo-video-fncs-the-fox-report-chris-wallace-calls-presidential-interruption-by-neil-munro-outrageous/ on WordPress.
ReplyDeleteYou can also see this post at Real Life Journal:http://reallifejournalusa.blogspot.com/2012/06/talking-points-memo-video-fncs-fox.html on Blogger.
ReplyDelete