Freedom or Totalitarianism

Freedom or Totalitarianism
Liberty or Death

Friday, February 22, 2013

Ederik Schneider: 'How to Wear Over-The-Knee-Boots'

Source:Pop Sugar Fashion- with a look at jeans in boots.

Source:Real Life Journal

"Thigh-high boots are right on trend for Fall, which is why we've created some helpful guidelines so you can rock them all season long! Shop our favorite boots here, and start wearing your sexy over-the-knee boots now. On Allison: Mango vest, Forever 21 top, Vince Camuto skirt" 


The woman at this store in the frozen food section, represents the modern, sexy, but stylish and adult look for beautiful, sexy women, at least when it comes to fall and winter fashion. And example of how denim jeans, even skin-tight denim jeans are versatile: you can dress them up like this sexy blond, or you can dress your tight denims down with a t-shirt and flip flops or t-shirt and boots.

Source:Real Life Journal- jeans in boots at the supermarket.

Sandra B, (from The Booted Cat) is the perfect example of why guys love women in jeans in boots and boots and jeans and general. A beautiful, sexy blonde with a great body and great fashion model.


Source:The Booted Cat- model Sandra B.

From Ederik Schneider

Jeans in boots is a classic look that was finally brought back into style in the fall of 2005. Before I was even blogging, I noticed beautiful, sexy women on the streets as I going home from work not just wearing skinny jeans, which also came out that year, but dressing up their skinny denims with blouses, suit jackets, fur jackets and coats, suede jackets, and leather jackets, leather belts, western belts and not just with their boots, which is has been around for women at least since the late 1970s (boots and jeans) but with their jeans in their boots, which also came into style in the late 1970s and went out of style in the late 80s or so. But not it's back for about 10 (jeans in boots) and I don't see it leaving anytime soon.  

Thursday, February 21, 2013

The Atlantic: Ta-Nehisi Coates: 'The Emancipation of Barack Obama'

Source:The Atlantic- Barack H. Obama (Democrat, Illinois) 44th President of the United States.

"Why the reelection of the first black president matters even more than his election

In early 1861, on the eve of the Civil War, the Georgia politician Henry Benning appealed to the Virginia Secession Convention to join the Confederate cause. In making his case, he denounced the “Black Republican party” of President Abraham Lincoln, arguing that his election portended “black governors, black legislatures, black juries, black everything.” The predicted envelopment surely took longer than he thought, but by 2008, Benning looked like Nostradamus. After the black governors, the black legislators, the integrated juries, Benning’s great phantom—“black everything”—took human form in the country’s 44th president, Barack Obama.

Wednesday, February 20, 2013

Reason: Jacob Sullum: 'A Paternalist Worries About Paternalism

Source:Reason Magazine- Cass Sunstein might be New York City Nanny Michael Bloomberg's best friend in the whole world right now.

"Harvard law professor Cass Sunstein, who advocates "libertarian paternalism" in his book Nudge (co-authored by University of Chicago economist Richard Thaler), worries about the consequences of inviting the government to protect us from ourselves in a recent New York Review of Books essay. Sunstein agrees with Bowdoin philosopher Sarah Conly, author of Against Autonomy: Justifying Coercive Paternalism, that people are prone to cognitive biases that lead to decisions they regret:

For example, many of us show "present bias": we tend to focus on today and neglect tomorrow. For some people, the future is a foreign country, populated by strangers. Many of us procrastinate and fail to take steps that would impose small short-term costs but produce large long-term gains. People may, for example, delay enrolling in a retirement plan, starting to diet or exercise, ceasing to smoke, going to the doctor, or using some valuable, cost-saving technology. Present bias can ensure serious long-term harm, including not merely economic losses but illness and premature death as well.

But while Sunstein wants to help people achieve their own goals through relatively mild interventions, such as displaying fruit more conspicuously in cafeterias and making 401(k) participation automatic unless employees opt out, Conly believes sterner measures, including outright prohibition, are sometimes justified. She sees New York City's ban on trans fats in restaurant dishes as a model of effective paternalism, and she favors government-mandated limits on food portions. At the same time, she is "ambivalent" about preventing people from using food stamps to buy soda: "She is not convinced that the health benefits would be significant, and she emphasizes that people really do enjoy drinking soda." Her "most controversial claim," Sunstein says, is that the benefits of banning cigarettes would outweigh the costs. Sunstein is appropriately skeptical:

You can read the rest of Jacob Sullum's column at Reason Magazine

Robert Wenzel: Murray Rothbard On Milton Friedman's Negative Income Tax (1968)

Source:Robert Wenzel- Murray Rothbard, perhaps in 1968 or 69.

"Murray Rothbard On Milton Friedman's Plan to Make Welfare Payments Efficient" 

I don't think Professor Milton Friedman was ever in favor of any type of public safety net. But in the late 1960s, like with crime, racial and civil unrest, crime and Welfare were major issues in America. To the point that Professor Friedman felt the need to speak out about Welfare, since he was an economics professor and thought he would get into the debate and offer a serious compromise to either government doing nothing on Welfare, or government giving people in poverty large, taxpayer funded, Welfare payments, to support themselves and their families.

What Professor Friedman proposed in I believe 1968, was what he called the Negative Income Tax. It would replace the entire Federal safety net in America and replace it would one, big Welfare check, that people in poverty could use to cover their housing, food, health care, etc. But no more Medicaid, Aid To Dependent Families, Food Stamps, etc. William F. Buckley thought the Friedman plan was so interesting, that he had Professor Friedman on his Firing Line program in 1968 to debate the Friedman plan with Professor Friedman.

Tuesday, February 19, 2013

Ayn Rand Institute: Yaron Brook: 'Yaron Answers: Aren't Entitlements Part Of The Social Contract?'

Source:Ayn Rand Institute- President Yaron Brook.

"Yaron Brook answers a question from John: "Aren't entitlements part of the social contract? Laissez Fair Blog

FREE EBOOK: “ROOSEVELTCARE: HOW SOCIAL SECURITY IS SABOTAGING THE LAND OF SELF-RELIANCE” Ayn Rand Institute


"an actual or hypothetical agreement among the members of an organized society or between a community and its ruler that defines and limits the rights and duties of each" 

According to Merriam Webster 

"a binding agreement between two or more persons or parties
especially : one legally enforceable" 


I'm more inline with Yaron Brook on the so-called so-contract, then I'm with Merriam Webster. No one ever officially signs up and agrees to pay into any government social contract. We're just required to by law, once we start working, which for most of us is in our teen years. 

As someone who believes in some form of the public safety net, the better way to look at lets say public social insurance, is to look at being a member of a society (in this case a country) as if you are the member of a social club. When you become a member of that club or society, you agree to the rules automatically. And just because you don't take advantage of all the services that the club offers, that doesn't mean generally your monthly fees are going to be smaller than someone who uses all the club's services.

What public social insurance is, (or the safety net) it's an insurance system that we all pay into, but like with private insurance, we only collect from it, when we actually need it. When we're out-of-work, can't afford our own health insurance plan, can't get affordable housing on our own, etc. 

When so-called Libertarians argue against the safety net or government in general, they're really arguing in favor of a society and country by how they argue against government, by saying that they never signed up to pay for that and never agree to pay for it, so why should they. The public sector is obviously different from the private sector. But one can't exist without the other. The public needs revenue from the private. The private needs security from the public.

Monday, February 18, 2013

Liberty Pen: Firing Line With William F. Buckley- Thomas Sowell: Affirmative Action

Source:Liberty Pen- Professor Thomas Sowell, on Firing Line With William F. Buckley in 1983.
"Thomas Sowell dives into an issue of race, culture and politics. Liberty Pen."

From Liberty Pen

This might be surprising but there are group or faction in the African-American community, a Conservative-Libertarian faction that doesn't believe in affirmative action and if anything would like to see it repealed. Even though millions of African-Americans have benefited from it and professor Thomas Sowell is one of them.

There African-Americans who are against Affirmative Action because they see it as two forms of racism even though its designed to benefit groups of people who have been left out because of racial reasons or the lack of opportunities when it comes to education and economic development. And the reason for this has to do with the fact that they see affirmative action as racist but for a couple of reasons.

One, that AA denies Caucasians, as well as Asian-Americans access to economic opportunity because of their race and that already too many Caucasians and Asians have access to that opportunity and that the employer or whatever needs to be more diversified under law.

The other reason why some African-Americans see affirmative action as racist because they believe that so-called Progressives Caucasian, African American and others view African-Americans as secretively inferior to Caucasians and Asians and need special treatment to be successful in life. And basically see affirmative action as insulting towards African-Americans and another form of government dependence. Rather then African-Americans having the same freedom to be able to live and run their own lives. The same freedom that Caucasians and Asians have in America.

Sunday, February 17, 2013

Peter Schiff: Dylan Ratigan Show (2010)

Source:MSNBC- Dylam Ratigan interviewing Libertarian economist Peter Schiff.

"Dylan Ratigan talks to Peter Schiff. 

 Is there a gold bubble?

Is there a dollar bubble?

What percentage of Americans own gold, or silver?" 

From 1514 Mojo

"Dylan Ratigan interviews Peter Schiff" 

Source:Go Schiff Go- Libertarian economist Peter Schiff on MSNBC.

From Go Schiff Go

Saturday, February 16, 2013

Hoover Institution: Uncommon Knowledge With Peter Robinson: 'Thomas Sowell Dismantling America'

Source:Hoover Institution- talking to Conservative Professor Thomas Sowell.

"Thomas Sowell, arguably the greatest American Public Intellectual discussing the possible decline and fall of America and the programs and attitudes embodied in the Obama Administration, that guarantee it." 

Friday, February 15, 2013

Julie Skyhigh: Denim Jeans Fetish

Source:Julie Skyhigh- Belgian Goddess Julie Skyhigh, in skinny jeans in boots. She has a great denim and boots fetish that guys should thank God for. Even if they're Atheist. LOL
Source:Real Life Journal 

"On the road to buy my burburry trench (it's a gift from a fan)
Hi I'm julieskyhigh from Belgium, 21yrs old girl.you can find my website on my chanel-profile on C4S/47732. I'm in love with luxe high heels, boots, and lingerie and also nylons of course....just..." 


At risk of sounding like an old man: I don’t get the women smoking in jeans fad. I get the tight jeans and skinny jeans part, but what is so sexy or awesome or hot or whatever about seeing a woman smoking regardless of what she is wearing? Especially since smoking is :"like so not awesome anymore”. (To use a valley phrase) With so many Americans understanding the dangers of tobacco and the addiction part and not wanting to deal with the health effects of tobacco consumption later on in life.

Now as far as the woman in the video, again not interested in the smoking part. But a very attractive sexy woman in skinny denim jeans in boots. A classic look that is not going away anytime soon, not with women like this and with healthier and curvy women around and still coming up.

Thursday, February 14, 2013

Michelle Rodriguez- The Fast and The Furious (2001)

 

Source:Alamy Stock Photo- take a ride with Hollywood Goddess Michelle Rodriguez.

Source:Real Life Journal 

"MICHELLE RODRIGUEZ, THE FAST AND THE FURIOUS, 2001" 

From Alamy Stock Photo 

"The Fast and the Furious Deleted Scene Dom & Letty Full Garage scene Kiss. Michelle Rodriguez and Vin Diesel."  

Source:Enduh Utami- Vin Diesel and Michelle Rodriguez.

From Michelle Rodriguez Brazil 

The Fast and The Furious is not one of my favorite movies and certainly not a great movie and perhaps not even a very good movie. It is watchable and it is entertaining and has a lot of good car races and car chases. The cast is fairly good, but this movie is mostly a style movie intended on looking cool based on special effects, catch phrases and the people in it.

Not so much on plot and little and perhaps annoying things to young producers and directors today, things like acting and writing. Not a very good movie based on that, but that is not what this movie is about anyway. But perhaps the best three parts of this movie are Michelle Rodriguez, Vin Diesel and Letty and Dom together. They actually seem like real people in this movie. And not people trying to be someone else. And they look great and are great together. As you see in this deleted scene. 

Liberty Pen: 'Murray Rothbard - Involuntary Commitment'

Source:Liberty Pen- with a look at involuntary commitment.

"On the practice of locking people up on the grounds they are a potential danger to themselves or others. Liberty Pen"

From Liberty Pen 

Sounds like what Liberty Pen is arguing here, is that committing people who are mentally ill, even non-criminals and people who are just incompetent and suffer from mental illness, somehow violates the rights of the mentally ill. Which just sounds ridiculous on its face. 

I mean how free can a mentally ill or incompetent person be anyway? Especially how free can they can to control what happens to their own lives? And if they do represent some physical danger to society, like not being able to control their anger and temper and act out violently when they're angry and because of those things, to represent a real threat to a free society, even if they're not career criminals, I believe society has a right to protect itself. And that's one of the reasons why we have prisons and mental hospitals, to protect the free society.

Wednesday, February 13, 2013

Brooke & Company: 'Learn How to Line Dance, Tush Push'



Source:Brooke & Company- showing people how to line dance.

Source:Real Life Journal

"Find this video and other line dances like Slap Leather, Watermelon Crawl, Sleazy Slide, Tush Push, Cowboy Cha Cha all available on DVD from:Brooke & Company." 

From Brooke & Company

Line dancing ain't my thang, (so to speak) but I would be more than happy to learn how and do it with a sexy woman who knows how to do it. And is something that I love watching sexy country and cowgirls do and watching them move. Because they are very attractive sexy women who take care of themselves and keep in great shape because they sort of have to because of the lifestyles they live.

And the work they do either something to do with the country music business, even managing or working at country bars, or actually being performers themselves. Or working on farms or ranches out West like in Colorado. And they look great moving around and moving their legs and everything else. Giving guys a lot of thrill rides, if you know what I mean. And a pleasure to watch.

Roll Call: Steven T. Dennis: 'President Obama Aims to Put GOP on Defense in State of the Union Address'

Source:Roll Call- writer Steven T. Dennis.

"President Barack Obama used his State of the Union address to pressure Republicans to avoid automatic spending cuts set to hit next month while proposing a host of new economic, energy and education initiatives sure to please his base.

The president asked Congress to work with him, telling the nation that the economy is poised for growth if politicians in Washington, D.C., don’t commit any more self-inflicted wounds.

Indeed, Obama aims to put Republicans in a box. They will own the sequester if they refuse to compromise on more tax revenue from the wealthy and corporations, according to a senior administration official — even as the GOP, in turn, tries to hang it on the White House.

“Together, we have cleared away the rubble of crisis, and can say with renewed confidence that the state of our union is strong,” Obama said.

But, he said, too many people still need jobs, even as corporate profits have hit all-time highs.

“Let’s agree, right here, right now, to keep the people’s government open, pay our bills on time, and always uphold the full faith and credit of the United States of America,” he said, knowing full well another shutdown showdown looms next month, followed by another debt ceiling hike come May. Like many of his lines, the appeal got a healthy response from Democrats, less so from the GOP.

The president also announced an assortment of new proposals in the speech that will cheer his base but are likely to face trouble getting through a divided Congress. For example, he may find Republicans a hard sell in his push for a $9-an-hour minimum wage, an ambitious new plan for universal access to pre-kindergarten and all-day kindergarten, assorted plans for green-energy subsidies, a raft of new gun laws and even a new call for climate change legislation.

None of his proposals will add to the deficit, Obama promised.

“Nothing I’m proposing tonight should increase our deficit by a single dime. It’s not a bigger government we need, but a smarter government that sets priorities and invests in broad-based growth,” Obama said.

A minimum wage hike from $7.25 to $9 by the end of 2015 would give raises to 15 million workers, according to the White House, restoring the buying power the wage level had in 1981 and lifting many of those workers over the poverty line. 

He also said he wants Congress to pursue a bipartisan, market-based solution like the one Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., worked on. But the president also warned that if Congress won’t act, “I will.” That section got a chilly reception from the GOP.

However, his push for a comprehensive immigration policy rewrite got a warm bipartisan cheer, with Republicans such as Sen. Orrin G. Hatch of Utah standing up to applaud his push. Hatch co-authored the Dream Act only to join in a filibuster of it in 2010, but the GOP has clearly had a change of heart on the issue.

Obama ended his speech with an emotional appeal for his gun control agenda, acknowledging that the proposals may not pass, but deserve a vote.

“This time is different,” he said, noting that overwhelming majorities support background checks and other proposals. He appealed to lawmakers using the names of recent gun violence victims, such as murdered Chicago teenager Hadiya Pendleton, whose family was in the audience.

“Gabby Giffords deserves a vote. The families of Newtown deserve a vote. The families of Aurora deserve a vote. The families of Oak Creek, and Tucson, and Blacksburg, and the countless other communities ripped open by gun violence — they deserve a simple vote,” Obama said. 

But much of the speech included a laundry list of proposals similar to ones he’s proposed in the past — which Congress has put on a shelf. Obama at one point thanked Congress for enacting some of his proposals and said lawmakers should pass the rest now.

He made his seemingly perennial pitch for a $50 billion infrastructure package. This time under the slogan “Fix it First,” he emphasized the need to repair existing bridges rather than build new projects. Other proposals include a push for a massive refinancing for homeowners at today’s low rates, $15 billion to rehabilitate or demolish damaged or vacant properties and the creation of 20 new “Promise Zones” for development.

Many of the proposals are relatively modest, but they are sure to poll well. That includes the president’s plan for $1 billion to create 15 manufacturing institutes around the country — an idea that had members of both parties cheering — and a new “college scorecard” aimed at giving students information comparing costs and quality. Obama will use his executive authority to create three new manufacturing centers while waiting for Congress to act.

And there were the usual pushes to end tax breaks for companies that ship jobs overseas while calling for tax code reform.

Obama also addressed the nuclear threats from the Iran and North Korea — calling for diplomacy, a unified world response and beefed up missile defenses. But he also called for new talks with Russia to further reduce nuclear arsenals and touted a peace dividend from ending the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan as one way to pay for a new long-term transportation spending plan. 

Obama’s plan to reduce the American troops in Afghanistan by 34,000 by a year from Tuesday night leaked earlier in the day. It builds on the president’s attempts to portray the tides of war as receding on his watch — and it seemed popular inside the room. He also announced a new cybersecurity executive order while calling on Congress to act.

The Republican reaction was swift, and almost uniformly negative. Indeed, some lawmakers, including Sen. James M. Inhofe, R-Okla., sent out embargoed, canned missives hours before the speech began.

Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., led the official GOP response, telling his personal story and wrapping it in small-government Republican ideals. Government programs aimed at helping the middle class too often hurt them, he said, targeting Obamacare, a subject mentioned only in passing by the president.

And Speaker John A. Boehner, R-Ohio, who had to sit through a series of jabs aimed squarely at him, just a few feet behind the president, issued a negative press release not long after the speech ended.

Boehner called the speech “more of the same ‘stimulus’ policies that have failed to fix our economy and put Americans back to work. We cannot grow the middle class and foster job creation by growing government and raising taxes. … We are only weeks away from the devastating consequences of the president’s sequester, and he failed to offer the cuts needed to replace it.”

Boehner said that instead of working with Republicans, Obama “appears to have chosen a go-it-alone approach to pursue his liberal agenda.”

In a briefing 

Boehner said that instead of working with Republicans, Obama “appears to have chosen a go-it-alone approach to pursue his liberal agenda.”

In a briefing Tuesday afternoon, senior administration officials argued that the speech was neither liberal nor conservative, noting that many of the ideas have long had bipartisan support.

Some are explicitly so — such as a new election reform commission that will be headed by top Obama campaign lawyer Bob Bauer and top Romney lawyer Ben Ginsberg. But many of the proposals are likely to wind up as so much cannon fodder for a GOP intent on reining in government, not expanding its reach.

That’s a reality even administration officials quietly acknowledge."

From Roll Call

Tuesday, February 12, 2013

David Boaz: 'Toward Liberty: The Idea That Is Changing the World'


Source:Amazon- David Boaz's book.

"Those looking for a comprehensive anthology of libertarian thought on today's pressing issues should seek out Toward Liberty.. -- National Review on June 3, 2002

Jimmy Carter. Tip O'Neill. Energy czars. Gas lines. ABC-NBC-CBS. Mao Tse-tung. The Soviet Union. Apartheid. It was a different era.
What wasn't so obvious at the time was that it was the end of an era.

In 1977 the Soviet Union seemed a permanent fixture. The Democrats controlled Washington, and the big three networks had 91 percent of television viewers. Philosopher-statesman Daniel Patrick Moynihan lamented that "liberal democracy on the North American model has simply no relevance to the future. It is where the world was, not where it is going."

Twenty-five years later, the world has changed so much that we may have forgotten what a different era 1977 was. Within a few years Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher were moving public policy in the direction of lower taxes, less regulation, and privatization.

Today, the conventional wisdom is that Anglo-American democratic capitalism is the only viable model left in the world. After the tyrannies and central planning of the 20th century, true liberalism is making a comeback.

Everywhere that governments will allow it, people are choosing open markets, open societies, and responsibility for their own lives. Information, commerce, and investment increasingly flow in response to the choices of free people, not the dictates of politicians.

But the triumph of liberalism is by no means inevitable. There never was a golden age of liberty, and there never will be. Although we seem to have left behind some of the worst forms of government, we must remember that within the past century we have endured communism, fascism, and national socialism.

In this book are some of the people and ideas associated with the Cato Institute in its first 25 years. ­­Karl Popper on the failure of communism, Peter Bauer on economic development, Helen Suzman on the end of apartheid, F. A. Hayek on money and information, Milton Friedman on markets in China, Mario Vargas Llosa on "neoliberalism," Carolyn Weaver and José Piñera on Social Security, Antonin Scalia and Richard Epstein on the role of judges, Alan Greenspan on globalization, Nadine Strossen on Clinton's constitutional conduct, P. J. O'Rourke on rights and responsibilities, and Walter Williams on affirmative action.

Twenty-five years after Moynihan's dirge, the anti-liberal scholars Stephen Holmes and Cass Sunstein complain that libertarian ideas are "astonishingly widespread in American culture." These essays show why they will continue to be.

From Amazon 

This looks like a book about what liberalism really is and what isn't. Only in America can someone who believes in liberal democracy, be considered center-left or social-democratic, even though the the so-called mainstream media in America calls center-leftists Liberals, where everywhere else, at least in the developed world, center-leftists are called social democrats or just plain in socialists, but in America they're called Liberals. 

According to the mainstream media in America, the most liberal people in the world, are Communists. Not Libertarians or Anarchists, but people who believe in the most centralized, national government and the least amount of individualism and individual liberty. 

For political labels to mean anything, anywhere, definitions also have to mean something as well. Liberals actually believe in liberalism, which comes from liberal democracy, not socialism or any other form of collectivism. The word liberal itself, comes from the word liberty, not socialist or any other collectivist. So someone who is a Liberal, is not someone who believes in no government, because that would be an Anarchist. 

A Liberal is someone who believes in liberty, as well as all the values that come from liberal democracy, not free speech, personal choice, property rights, (economic and personal) the rule of law, decentralization of power, checks and balances, equal rights and equal justice, equality of opportunity, personal mobility, limited but responsible government,  etc. 

A Liberal is not someone who believes that everyone in America is automatically entitled to a quality life in America, simply by being alive in America. And that it's the job of government to take care of everyone from cradle to grave, even people who are physically and mentally able to take care of themselves. 

Monday, February 11, 2013

Sandra B: Leather Model

Source:Cannizzaro- leather n denim model Sandra B.
Source:Real Life Journal

Thanks to the designer jeans revolution of the late 1990s and then the skinny jeans revolution of the mid 2000s, followed by boots coming back in a huge way, especially long boots, and women not just dressing up their boots, but their denim jeans, and with leather jackets always being so poplar, especially with denim jeans (men and women) we’re seeing the leather n denim look everywhere in America. And if there is one model online that makes that perfectly clear and has patent that look online in the modeling industry or modeling/adult entertainment industry, it’s the model that simply goes by the name SandraB.

From Cannizzaro 

Holy smokes, Batman: Leather Model Sandra B is smoking in her black leather jacket and skin-tight, blue denim jeans. Hate to see anything happen to her and have to get the Fire Department out here to rescue her. LOL 

Source:Cannizzaro- leather n denim model Sandra B.

From Cannizzaro 

The thing I think of when I see this photo is a beautiful, sexy women, who looks great both in leather and denim (especially together) and the boots as well and is very comfortable showing off her physical assets and letting the rest of the world see her. 

Source:Cannizzaro- leather n denim model Sandra B.

From Cannizzaro 

SandraB is part of several websites (perhaps she’s a freelance adult entertainer/model) and is all over social media, especially for the websites The Booted Cat and Leathered Life. She wears both leather and denim jeans, wears this beautiful, black leather studded biker jacket, and where’s it with he skinny denim jeans and black leather boots. I believe she or her body type, certainly is the reason why leather n denim and boots and jeans is so popular in America and why that look, especially boots and jeans and jeans in boots, has been so popular in America, especially in the fall and winter since the mid 2000s. 

Both leather and denim are very versatile looks. You can dress down denim and leather, as well as boots and you can dress them up. It sort of depends on the jacket, jeans, and boots. With SandraB you get both. She can look like she’s just going to her kids soccer game or something, or headed out to the club or going to a nice restaurant or on a date, in boots and jeans. Because again of how versatile, as well as stylish and sexy leather and denim, especially when you put them together, as well as boots, have become in America. 

SandraB is one of my favorite online adult entertainers/models, because even with the short, somewhat butch blond haircut, she’s really cute anyway, but beautiful as well, with the perfect body for both denim jeans, as well as leather jeans, and boots. And she’s always a pleasure to see and to check out. 

Friday, February 8, 2013

Colt Ford: Mr Goodtime (2009)



Source:Colt Ford- Mr. Goodtime.

Source:Real Life Journal

“Colt Ford “Mr Goodtime” – Official Music Video” 

From Colt Ford 

This photo is from the original video for this piece with the two women from the video. But that video is not currently available online right now.

Source:Colt Ford- grouppies?

Not a fan of country music, at least generally. I actually tend to make fun of it when I hear it and do my country boy impersonation. But I like this song and not because it is a country song, but because it sounds more like a country rock song. It has more of a rock beat to it and is a party song.

Plus the video looks real good with two sexy women in moving and running around and then you have Colt Ford in the background sing his tune using I guess his own concert video footage.

Plus this is a very well-written song and Colt has a real good voice. Like to hear him do more country rock, if not blues rock which is popular in the South and broader rural America. Because he has that type of personal background and sound to his music. So I like this song a lot and it have a very good video as well. 

Thursday, February 7, 2013

Liberty Pen: Q&A With Brian Lamb- Walter E. Williams: 'A Philosophy Of Self-Ownership'


Source:Liberty Pen- George Mason Professor Walter E. Williams on C-SPAN.

"Professor Williams explains the basic premise from which he operates. Liberty Pen

From Liberty Pen

Professor Williams has the perfect quote about property rights and self-ownership. He tells C-SPAN's Brian Lamb that people should have the right to do whatever they want, except for violating someone'e else's property rights. He says that Walter Williams is the property of Walter Williams. Brian Lamb is the property of Brian Lamb, etc. That every individual owns themself, until they interfere with the property rights of someone else. Meaning we as individuals can't murder, rape, steal, physically attack someone else. But what we do with our own lives, is up to us. And the only thing I would add to that is that we're also responsible for all the personal decisions that we make as well.

Wednesday, February 6, 2013

Paula Reynolds: Angie- Full Throttle Saloon (2012)

Source:Paula Reynolds- which one is Angie?

Source:Real Life Journal 

"Angie - Water Shoot Out Full Throttle Saloon 2012" 


Full Throttle Saloon is a show that I watch from time to time, not on a regular basis. And it is basically about a bar that is a hell of a lot more than a bar somewhere in the Dakotas. It is sort of a combination of concerts, amusement park and a bar. A basically and entertainment center for adults like you would see with casinos in Las Vegas. This place is not a casino as far as I know, but a place where adults can go and see all sorts of entertainment. 

I guess this was one of the shows that was put on at Full Throttle. A water fight with a big tall sexy curvy blonde, nailing another woman with her water gun in a water fight. And you see many different sexy women like Angie in events like this. And you see biker women, cowgirls, rocker chicks who come by to have a great time. As well as performing themselves and makes for an interesting place to have a good time. 

Reason Magazine: U.S. Senator Rand Paul: 'Containment & Radical Islam'

Source:U.S. Congress.GOV- U.S. Senator Rand Paul (Republican, Kentucky)

"The following is text of a speech delivered by Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) at the Heritage Foundation on February 6, 2013.

Foreign policy is uniquely an arena where we should base decisions on the landscape of the world as it is . . . not as we wish it to be. I see the world as it is. I am a realist, not a neoconservative, nor an isolationist. 

When candidate John McCain argued in 2007 that we should remain in Iraq for 100 years, I blanched and wondered what the unintended consequences of prolonged occupation would be.  But McCain's call for a hundred year occupation does capture some truth: that the West is in for a long, irregular confrontation not with terrorism, which is simply a tactic, but with Radical Islam.

As many are quick to note, the war is not with Islam but with a radical element of Islam—the problem is that this element is no small minority but a vibrant, often mainstream, vocal and numerous minority. Whole countries, such as Saudi Arabia, adhere to at least certain radical concepts such as the death penalty for blasphemy, conversion, or apostasy. A survey in Britain after the subway bombings showed 20% of the Muslim population in Britain approved of the violence." 

Tuesday, February 5, 2013

Cecelia Lauren: 'Country Girls Do it Better'



Source:Cecelia Lauren- country music singer.

Source:Real Life Journal

"Country Girls (Do It Better) video by Cecilia Lauren and the Ocoee River Band. For more information visit:Cecelia Lauren or Facebook Fan Page." 

From Steve Insolfo

The song to me is pretty corny and maybe that is just because I’m not a country music fan. I kind of doubt that and perhaps I’m just being nice. But I like the video because I like sexy country girls, which is exactly what you see in this video. Sexy country girls in action on the farm or ranch doing their thing and perhaps doing it as well as country boys. Well at least they look at lot better than country boys. 

This is just an example of why guys regardless of where they come from like country girls and how they carry themselves at least from a physical perspective. Because these women tend to be very attractive and very sexy and you get to see them in action or horses and on stage and doing rodeos, driving trucks, riding motor bikes and everything else that country girls do.

The Atlantic: Elspeth Reeve: 'Paul Ryan vs. Eric Cantor in The Battle For The Future of The GOP'


Source:The Atlantic- writer Elspeth Reeve.

"On the very same day House Majority Leader Eric Cantor is giving a major speech about the GOP's next steps at the American Enterprise Institute, Politico reports that former vice-presidential candidate Paul Ryan is considering abandoning a 2016 presidential run in favor of consolidating power in the House in areas where Cantor has been influential... 

Monday, February 4, 2013

C-SPAN: 'Peter Schiff Calls Out The Fed For Creating The Prior & Next Crisis'


Source:C-SPAN- Libertarian economist Peter Schiff.

"Peter Schiff at The Atlantic's Economic Summit in Washington D.C. in 2012." 

From Peter Schiff

I agree with Peter Schiff on one thing: (which is a lot for me) interest rates in America are artificially too low. With all the debt and the trillion-dollar budget deficit, interest rates would probably be around 10% today and perhaps inflation as high, because of all the money that the U.S. Government is borrowing. Assuming the Congress and the Administration didn't do a damn thing about the budget deficit. 

But because the Federal Reserve controls the interest rates by themselves, Congress and The White House can say that they don't have to address the budget deficit or even pay for new government spending, because the interest rates are so low. 

You want to do real deficit reduction and perhaps put the government in a place where we can talk about balanced budgets again, like in the mid and late 1990s, let's have real interest rates in this country again, like we did in the late 1980s and early 90s.

Sunday, February 3, 2013

Common Sense Capitalism: 'Medicaid Since 1961'


Source:Common Sense Capitalism- with an inaccurate look at Medicaid.

"Chart: Federal Medicaid Spending Since 1961" 

From Common Sense Capitalism

Correction: Medicaid wasn't created until 1965. So this report is simply wrong, at least based on that.

Saturday, February 2, 2013

Ssierra Mike: Outfit of The Day (2012)

Source:Ssierra Mike- I guess showing off her new denim jeans.

Source:Real Life Journal

"Maglioncino Coin
Maglia a collo alto  Bershka
Jeans Bershka
Stivali scamosciati  Bershka
Orecchini -ricordo non pervenuto:-P
Anello Accessorize
Giacone Lana cotta : Mercato
Sciarpa  Bershka
Borsa Marrone  Bershka
Borsa senape  Bershka"


From Ssierra Mike 

If you want to know what is the classic winter look and even dress casual (boots and jeans that are dressed up) look for beautiful, sexy women, it’s the jeans in boots look. Skin-tight denim jeans stylish, sexy, and also practical for women in the winter because they show off the woman’s beautiful legs and butt, without making them look like a porn actress (depending on how she styles her jeans) but they also keep her warm. And the boots are comfortable and keep her feet warm.
Source:Real Life Journal- Classic winter look for American women. Skin-tight denim jeans in boots.

Strange video and not just because she was speaking in another language, I believe Italian. But that she felt the need to get herself so close to her computer I guess in order to get herself filmed. That she didn’t use a cam corder or something that could record from a distance and we could see her moving around or sitting down, or have someone film her. Instead of her just making the video right in front of her computer like she was uploading something for Facebook or MySpace, or a dating site or something.

But having said all that, pretty good with a good sense of style. Looking like a woman who is going out shopping in a big city on the weekend or something. With the makeup, jacket, great jeans and nice boots as well.